Pension and Welfare Plans before ERISA
Before the enactment of ERISA on September
1974, only three principal statues governed private pension plans:
the Internal Revenue Code m the Federal Welfare and Pension Plans
Disclosure Act of 1958 (WPPDA) and the Taft-Hartley Act, more
formally known as the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947.
The latter regulated collectively bargained multiemployer pension
plans.
Changes to the Internal Revenue Code enacted in 1942 established
minimum requirements for the design and operation of pension
plans. The principal purposes were to prevent plans from
discriminating among employees or disproportionately benefiting one
group of employees over another and to stop plans from taking
elaborate and large tax deductions unjustifiably.
Until 1974, the Internal Revenue Service was not concerned with the
actuarial soundness of plans. There were many unfunded
liabilities in pension plans. The Federal Welfare and Pension
Plans Disclosure Act of 1958 was enacted to protect plan assets
against fraudulent behavior by the plan administrator. The act
mandated that upon request, participants concerned with plan
malpractice would be provided with information concerning the plan.
If misuse or fraud were suspected, it was up to the participant to
bring charges against the administrator. A significant
amendment to the WPPDA was enacted in 1962. That amendment
authorized the Department of Justice to bring appropriate legal
action to protect plan participants interests and authorized the
Department of Labor to interpret and enforce the act. For the
first time, the burden of plan asset protection was placed upon the
government, rather than on the individual participant.
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
The shift from individual to government protection of
participants' rights mandated in 1962 would carry through to
ERISA. It reflected a concern for workers, that they
need protection from careless or criminal pension plan
administrators which was confirmed
by President John Kennedy in 1962 with appointment of the Committee
on Corporate Pension Funds and Other Retirement and Welfare
Programs. That committee issued its report in 1965, concluding
that private pension plans should continue as a major element in the nations's total retirement security program. The report
advocated many changes in the breadth of private plan regulation.
The report received widespread attention and led to the introduction of a number of legislative proposals. Congress
concluded that most plans were operated for the benefit of
participants on a sound basis, but some were not. To solve
this problem, Congress enacted ERISA. ERISA governs every
aspect of private pension and welfare plans including many
Washington employer group health - medical insurance plans and requires employers
who sponsor plans including Washington benefit plans to operate them in compliance with ERISA standards.
Employee benefits were
impacted in a major way in 1974 by a major federal legislation
entitled the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
Here are the major subsection of that legislation. they have major
impact on how Washington State benefits are structured including
Washington employer group health- medical insurance.
Title 1: Protection of Employee Benefit Rights
This section of ERISA placed the primary jurisdiction
over reporting disclosures, and fiduciary issues in the US
Department of Labor. The department of the Treasury is
given primary juisdiction over participation, vesting and funding.
During the first years of ERISA, this "dual-jurisdiction" led to a
number of problems, which were addressed in 1979 by Reorganization
Plan Number 4 . As a result of reorganizations and administrative
experience under ERISA, many mandates have been changed ,
resulting in a reduction of regulatory burdens.